Global, collaborative, technology-based initiatives across the learning spectrum (Pre-K, K-12, Academic, Work, Personal, Military/Police)

Members

Forum

AR/VR/AI (Shaunda Paden)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Subhajit Basu Nov 13, 2019. 12 Replies

Course Careers (Troy Buckholdt)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Bill Crose Nov 11, 2019. 4 Replies

Phd in ID – (Matt Meador)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Bill Crose Nov 10, 2019. 6 Replies

Lead With Your Brain (Rob Jenkins)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Bill Crose Nov 10, 2019. 6 Replies

Sales Training Innovations (Bruce Kopkin)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Bruce Kopkin Nov 8, 2019. 6 Replies

Technology - Can We Keep Up (Paula Smith)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Paul Terlemezian Nov 7, 2019. 3 Replies

Segment 8(19) – BYOL Plus - Proof

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Erick Nov 5, 2019. 3 Replies

Innovations in Video (Rich Beaudrie)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Rich Beaudrie Nov 4, 2019. 1 Reply

Incentives (Michael Ruege)

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019. Last reply by Michael Nov 4, 2019. 2 Replies

Open Conversation

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2019 Nov 3, 2019. 0 Replies

Blog Posts

What Are You Measuring?

Posted by Bill Crose on September 13, 2019 at 11:33am 0 Comments

A lifetime ago, my training department colleagues and I were satisfied with training data. We cranked out the requested ILT programs plus the "flavor of the year" content, we kept a busy training schedule, and made sure the coffee was always the right temperature. When accused of not delivering effective training because the learners didn't perform as they were trained, we took refuge in our management support role and not ultimately responsible or accountable for LEARNING or productivity.…

Continue

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

This segment will be delivered using the Georgia LEARNS BYOL Plus format.

Panelists:

Remarkable Speaker: Paula Larson https://www.linkedin.com/in/paula-s-larson-559959b/

Moderator: Paul Terlemezian https://www.linkedin.com/in/paulterlemezian/

BYOL Plus Definition: BYOL – The Bring Your Own Learning panel format was introduced by Georgia LEARNS in 2015. Panelists have up to two minutes (30 seconds would be fine) to present questions related to what they want to learn from the audience as well as present what they believe the audience can learn from the panelist's experience. Each panel is followed by 20-30 minute breakout discussion sessions. In 2016 we improved BYOL by concluding each segment with the “Plus” - a 5 to 10 minute closing presentation by a “Remarkable” speaker who will describe what they learned from the panelists and breakouts. Critical to the success of the panel is the moderator role. The moderator stimulates interaction before and after the event via the online discussions for each segment. During the event the moderator manages the panel and the sequence of activities for the panel. They also monitor the online discussion and encourage people to submit their ideas into it.

Views: 111

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What proof do we have (or need) that investments in learning have a positive impact to performance?

Have we set up control groups - and compared results?

Is there any proof that elearning is universally more effective or less effective than no learning, classroom learinng or social learning?

How would your role be different if validated proof was readily available to you?

Hi Everyone!  As a panelist, my questions and thoughts regarding "Proof" center around discovering the effectiveness of learning events to assess what people actually have learned to improve their performance at work.  The tools available to prove ROI of L&D programs tend to be much more descriptive and subjective, rather than numerical and objective.  Post-training quizzes, one-to-one discussions, employee surveys, participant case studies, and official certification exams are some ways to measure training effectiveness; yet, we all know that this takes time and implementing all levels of the Kirkpatrick model can be an expensive and time-consuming process.  

So what are best ways to tell the learning story and "prove" investments made to positively impact performance back on the job?     

I would like to challenge what "proof" really means and why does learning feel it has to prove its relevancy in ways that other key functions do not. Is ROI and "proof" a trap that leaders are falling into and are there other ways to show value opposed to fighting to justify existence.   

RSS

© 2020   Created by Paul Terlemezian.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service