Global, collaborative, technology-based initiatives across the learning spectrum (Pre-K, K-12, Academic, Work, Personal, Military/Police)

Members

Forum

GLN 2025 - Brenau Gen Z Communication Live

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025 Nov 3. 0 Replies

This event will be the fourth time that the Georgia LEARNS Community has learned with Professor Anna Deeb's SP108W Fundamentals of Speech Class within the Women's College at Brenau University.We will observe the students as they engage in a…Continue

GLN 2025 - Higher Score Strategies and Georgia LEARNS Now - SomethingAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025 Oct 27. 0 Replies

A concept documented in "Good to Great" by Jim Collins offered that greatness was achieved in many instances where leaders decided "who would be on the bus and then let those on the bus decide where the bus would go." The purpose of the GLN…Continue

GLN 2025 - E5T5 - CuriousAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025 Oct 16. 0 Replies

The format and outcome of a CuriousAbout is designed to allow for the discovery and application of curiosity to accelerate successful business outcomes.The E5T5 (Each Five Teach Five) Concept was adapted from the Each One Teach One concept by the…Continue

GLN 2025 - Online Courses - CuriousAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025. Last reply by Brent Darnell Oct 17. 1 Reply

The format and outcome of a CuriousAbout is designed to allow for the discovery and application of curiosity to accelerate successful business outcomes.There is an ongoing effort to invest in creating online courses. At the same time, it has become…Continue

GLN 2025 - Emotional Intelligence - TeachAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025. Last reply by Paul Terlemezian Oct 16. 1 Reply

Session Leader: Brent DarnellBrent Darnell is undoubtedly a transformative figure in the construction industry, pioneering the integration of emotional…Continue

GLN 2025 - Embracing Uncertainty as Fuel for Growth - TeachAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025 Oct 14. 0 Replies

Session Leader: Sherry HeylEmbracing Uncertainty as a Catalyst for GrowthIn times of rapid change, uncertainty often feels uncomfortable or even threatening. Yet,…Continue

GLN 2025 - Debate for Discovery: Finding Better Answers Together - TeachAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025 Oct 14. 0 Replies

Session Leader: Sherry HeylDebate for Discovery: Finding Better Answers TogetherA Not So Simple Politics x Amplified Concepts WorkshopIn a world where every…Continue

GLN 2025 - Flow - CuriousAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025. Last reply by Judith Lee Glick-Smith Oct 28. 2 Replies

The format and outcome of a CuriousAbout is designed to allow for the discovery and application of curiosity to accelerate successful business outcomes.Our guest will be …Continue

GLN 2025 - "10 Days Later" - ChatAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025. Last reply by Paul Terlemezian Oct 20. 2 Replies

Session Leaders: ChatGPTPaul TerlemezianZoom Details…Continue

GLN 2025 - Building Community Now - TeachAbout

Started by Paul Terlemezian in Georgia LEARNS 2025. Last reply by Judith Lee Glick-Smith Oct 30. 2 Replies

Session Leader: Judith Glick-Smith, Ph.D.In the face of an loneliness epidemic, extreme polarization, and unbridled anger on social media, what options do we have to Build Community Now?What…Continue

Blog Posts

What Are You Measuring?

Posted by Bill Crose on September 13, 2019 at 11:33am 1 Comment

A lifetime ago, my training department colleagues and I were satisfied with training data. We cranked out the requested ILT programs plus the "flavor of the year" content, we kept a busy training schedule, and made sure the coffee was always the right temperature. When accused of not delivering effective training because the learners didn't perform as they were trained, we took refuge in our management support role and not ultimately responsible or accountable for LEARNING or productivity.…

Continue

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

2016 Segment 10 - Infant and Maternal Mortality Rate Reduction

Outcome: Infant and maternal mortality at childbirth will be eliminated globally.

Panelists:

"Remarkable" Speaker:

Moderator:

How might we build a solution that results in the stated outcome?

Is the stated outcome desirable? Attainable?

How can you help us achieve it? Or - is there a better outcome that you can suggest?

Views: 163

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

We may learn from how the healthcare industry approaches building solutions as it deals with inherent conflicts such as cost, ethics, behavior, environment and access. As you watch this video - imagine that Monica Oss is talking about education instead of healthcare -

http://georgialearnsnow.ning.com/video/video/editMultiple?uploadBat...

I appreciated the opportunity to examine this topic during the 2016 Georgia Learns conference.  

We discussed global data collection, reporting, need for accuracy of data and a standardized definition as well as the differences that define contributing factors of high infant mortality rates in the developing countries versus the developed countries of our planet.

The goal of improving infant mortality rates in America appears to offer two choices: 1) follow the lead of the top 4 developed countries with the lowest infant mortality levels which share these common factors:  a) few unwed mothers (greater number of intact family units and extended families), b) high maternal education, c) low maternal stress, d) nutrition that excludes processed foods and GMOs, e) abortion laws that are restriction and thus uncommon or 2) develop and expand use of technology to decrease infant mortality and potential lessen the role of the woman as bearer of children and future generations

(ie.,  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAhjPd4uNFY

Genetic Engineering Will Change Everything Forever – CRISPR)

Question:  As CRISPR babies (the first one was born in China in 2016) proliferate, the cost of "having" a CRISPR baby could be as high as $150 - $1MM (who knows?).  If a family (or government) invests that amount of money, you can be certain conversations will take place re: the optimal venue for gestation; a woman's womb or an external womb?  

I imagine the next 5 years will bring this discussion out of the laboratory, academia and ethics committee and into our dining room as we discuss the future of our families and communities. 

Thank you again, Kellie

Kellie - thanks for posting your research and stretching our minds!

It is fascinating to contemplate the questions related to CRISPR - Gene editing http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2016/10/31/crispr_and_gene_...

To think of the questions facing families today regarding finding the right mate based on religion, politics and social norms - soon science will be a factor as well - pro or con related to gene editing!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Paul Terlemezian.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service